JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 22 (6): 663-669 (2009)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090035
© 2009 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Rapid Responses: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiemstra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Miranda, R. L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiemstra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Miranda, R. L. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Role of Non-Group A Streptococci in Acute Pharyngitis

Jeffrey Tiemstra, MD and Rosita L. F. Miranda, MD, MS, DLO

Family Medicine Center (JT), University of Illinois at Chicago
Department of Family Medicine (RLFM), University of Illinois at Chicago

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Jeffrey Tiemstra, MD, Associate Professor of Clinical Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Family Medicine Center (M/C 397), University Village, 722 West Maxwell Street, Suite 235, Chicago, IL 60607 (E-mail: jtiemstr{at}uic.edu)

Background: The role of non-group A streptococci (non-GAS) as pathogens of acute pharyngitis is controversial. Data are limited and conflicting on whether these bacteria are true pathogens of pharyngitis and whether treatment is indicated in all cases or just select cases. However, non-GAS are well-documented as being pathogens of other diseases, including neonatal sepsis, pneumonia, endocarditis, and urinary tract infections. If non-GAS are pathogens of acute pharyngitis, treatment may speed recovery as well as prevent complications. The objective of this study was to determine whether, in cases of pharyngitis in which non-GAS is identified on culture, the clinical signs and symptoms resemble those of group A streptococcal pharyngitis thus implicating them as true pathogens or if they resemble culture-negative pharyngitis, suggesting these cases are viral in etiology.

Method: This was a 3-group retrospective case-control study (N = 915; mean age, 26 years). Cases included all patients with non-GAS identified on culture (n = 180). The control group 1 consisted of all patients with GAS infection identified by a rapid strep test or culture (n = 145); control group 2 included all patients with a negative rapid strep test and culture (presumed viral pharyngitis; n = 584). Multivariate analysis was used to compare the prevalence of 5 clinical features among the groups.

Results: The presence of headache and fever was significantly associated with streptococcal infection, with no difference between GAS and non-GAS infection. Exudates and lymphadenopathy were also significantly associated with both GAS and non-GAS infection compared with viral infection. When 2 criteria were present, the risk of any streptococcal infection rose to 55% (27% for non-GAS or GAS); when 3 or more criteria were present, the rate of any streptococcal infection rose to 81% (non-GAS infection, 34%; GAS infection, 47%).

Conclusion: In this predominantly young, adult population with acute pharyngitis, non-GAS infection was as common as GAS infection and was associated with the same clinical features typically associated with GAS. Although the benefits of treating non-GAS pharyngitis in terms of either symptomatic relief or prevention of sequelae are unproven, clinicians may want to consider treating patients with proven or presumptive non-GAS pharyngitis who fail to respond to symptomatic therapy or who are at increased risk for sequelae of group B or group C streptococcal infections, such as those patients who are or have close contact with pregnant women, neonates, and elderly or immunocompromised persons. Further study is needed to determine whether patients with non-GAS pharyngitis benefit from targeted antibiotic treatment.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. M. Centor
Re: Role of Non-Group A Streptococci in Acute Pharyngitis
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2010; 23(3): 423 - 423.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. Tiemstra
Response: Re: Role of Non-Group A Streptococci in Acute Pharyngitis
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2010; 23(3): 423 - 423.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. A. Bowman and A. V. Neale
A Typical Day in the Family Medicine Office
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2009; 22(6): 597 - 599.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The importance of non-group A strep pharyngitis
Robert M. Centor
JABFM Online, 24 Nov 2009 [Full text]



HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Board of Family Medicine.